forked from Dark-Horse-Linux/pyrois
Consider centralized patch management #1
Reference in New Issue
Block a user
Delete Branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
During updates of package versions, the patches for those versions will also change.
This introduces a small source management problem. The build process for these packages does not really change, but, the patches themselves will at times, and, going through every build script for each package update is time consuming, almost purely due to patching.
Consider introducing a patch management scheme that takes in the package name, version, and pass identifier so that which patches get applied to which versions are managed in one place instead of spread out throughout the package build scripts.
The tradeoff is the package scripts are no longer standalone for their intended function, so, this warrants both consideration and opposition.
Introduced centralized patch managementto Consider centralized patch management